Small and large countries weigh the advantages and disadvantages of national ID cards. Immigration, border control, and economic reasons are just some of the controversial issues. It is quite simple to understand the apparent need to clearly identify a person’s nationality for reasons such as work and citizenship except using fake ids. When looking at the essence of who should receive the medical services offered by the government rather than not providing these services, it is essential to identify the people of the country.

Many countries that examine the possibilities of such needs do so because the only way to recognize nationally is that anyone has printed a sheet of paper. These documents are simple to generate and have no photo or other identifying marks indicating which belongs to other than the owner. Such documents are easily stolen or duplicated by people to enter the country or receive citizenship benefits. Only cost control and reduction of abuse in these types of services are sufficient economic reasons to introduce a national image card identification system. Due to the needs mentioned here, some of the requirements of ID cards will include biometric information from a simple picture of individual characteristics, including height, eye color, and gender. Some countries include fingerprints and even retinal scanning information on national ID cards as well as national databases.

Many countries have started or considered that this process did not accurately reflect their current citizenship or any relevant or reliable census information. The launch of a national identification process and the implementation of identity cards in a country in this situation has many other benefits, such as border control, control of citizenship benefits, criminal records and even the services. Currently, some of these countries have systems to monitor these problems, but in most cases, these systems are free for everyone. Creation of a national identity card and the system will allow the creation of a database that integrates all this information into a simpler solution.

Outsourcing has also become a topic of discussion as governments examine their best solutions. For many countries, doing a lot of data collection, capturing photos and providing ID cards to every citizen is too important for management to manage its existing resources. Some companies provide solutions for governments and FullIdentity.com is one of them. In addition to providing fake ids cards, this company provides tracking solutions alongside ID card implementations for seven years. In many cases, systems are created for countries that are not only easy to use but also provide a financial benefit to countries implementing these solutions. For laypersons, when outsourcing the ID card needs a country to a third party, the costs are lower than if the government took responsibility for deploying a solution internally. Due to reduced costs, the government can pay lower citizens for identity cards and still have financial benefits for the country. In the beginning, a country can win by setting up a national system while protecting its resources in the long run.

It is difficult to find economic reasons for a government not to put in place a system of the national identification system. Promoters shout that “big brother” is abolishing their rights and privacy; but should not we be able to look at our criminal records, military service, and border crossings? Is the government not responsible for ensuring that only its citizens receive benefits from their home country, or should anyone allow these benefits when their citizenship is abroad?